Kris J. Curran vs Stijn Feijen: Authority vs Automation on LinkedIn
Kris J. Curran builds slow, deep authority through ghostwritten storytelling (4 avg engagement, 35.5% conversation rate). Stijn Feijen builds fast, viral reach through AI-powered volume and shocking claims (425 avg engagement, 77.5% conversation rate). Choose Curran if you're selling high-ticket services. Choose Feijen if you're selling products or building a content business.
Kris J. Curran
Fractional Executive Operator & LinkedIn Ghostwriter | Turning Founder Vision Into Systems, Content, and Scale
Stijn Feijen
@ MakeUGC
- Curran: 1.2 posts/week, peer-to-peer voice, founder narrative focus. Feijen: 2.4 posts/week, proof-driven voice, AI tool stacks.
- Curran's 'That's not X, that's Y' reframes build trust. Feijen's shocking numbers ('550 videos per day') trigger comments.
- Curran wins trust and inbound leads. Feijen wins reach and conversation velocity.
- Curran teaches ghostwriting strategy. Feijen teaches automated content business models.
Side by side
| Dimension | Kris J. Curran | Stijn Feijen |
|---|---|---|
| Voice | Peer-like, tired of generic templates, speaks to silent frustration with short declarative sentences ('That's not ghostwriting. That's content production.'). | Confident and impatient, proof-obsessed, avoids hype in favor of costs and timelines ('No cameras. No editing marathons. No creative burnout.'). |
| Content mix | Five pillars: ghostwriting voice, consistency math, story mining, post types (credibility/problem-aware/conversion), audience building habits. | Four pillars: AI video production, automated business models, tool stacks with prompts, economics and ROI of AI content. |
| Hook style | Client credential ('Founders running $2M-$20M'), hot take contradiction ('most ghostwriters don't sound like clients'), quantified promise ('posting consistently over 90 days'). | Shocking volume ('550 videos per day'), contrarian bold statement ('No cameras'), demand validation ('This isn't luck. It's repeatable.'). |
| Engagement pattern | Low but consistent: 4 avg engagement per post, 35.5% conversation index. Readers engage deeply but in smaller numbers. | High and viral: 425 avg engagement per post, 77.5% conversation index. Readers engage frequently and at scale. |
| Posting cadence | 1.2 posts/week. Slower, more intentional. Best day: Saturday. | 2.4 posts/week. Double the frequency. Best day: Monday. |
Who wins what
425 avg engagement per post vs Curran's 4, and 77.5% conversation rate signals algorithmic favor and comment velocity.
77.5% conversation index vs Curran's 35.5%. Feijen's shocking numbers and proof stacks trigger immediate comment threads.
His problem-solution structure with reframes ('That's not X, that's Y') is immediately applicable to any founder's own content strategy.
2.4 posts/week sustained across 31 analyzed posts shows reliable cadence. Curran's 1.2 posts/week is slower but still consistent.
Pick Kris J. Curran if…- You sell high-ticket B2B services ($5K-$50K deals) and need to build founder authority through storytelling, not volume.
- You want to learn ghostwriting fundamentals: how to extract founder narratives and write like a real person, not a template.
- You're a solopreneur or small agency owner (under $2M revenue) who needs inbound leads from LinkedIn, not viral reach.
- Use the 'That's not X, that's Y' reframe pattern to name the real problem behind a common misconception. Example: 'That's not ghostwriting. That's content production.' Builds credibility through clarity.
- Mine your own founder story for three specific moments (client wins, failures, decisions) and turn each into a separate LinkedIn post over 90 days. Curran's 'story mining' pillar shows how narrative compounds.
- Post on Saturday instead of Monday. Curran's data shows Saturday performs best for his audience. Test this against your own ICP to find your best day.
Pick Stijn Feijen if…- You want to build a content business or product business that scales through volume, not personal brand authority.
- You're interested in AI tool stacks, automation workflows, and the economics of content production at scale ($1 per video, $5K-$10K/month revenue).
- You need to understand how to trigger algorithmic engagement through shocking claims, proof stacks, and contrarian hooks that drive comments.
- Lead with a shocking number or contrarian claim in the first line, then immediately prove it with a system, cost, or timeline. Feijen's '550 videos per day' hook generates 6709 engagements because it's specific and provable.
- Build a proof stack with three concrete results (cost per output, time saved, revenue generated). Feijen uses '$1 per video' and '$5K-$10K/month revenue' to justify the shift. Specificity beats adjectives.
- Post 2.4 times per week instead of 1.2. Double your cadence and test which day performs best (Feijen's data shows Monday). More frequency + algorithmic favor = more reach.
Curran and Feijen are solving different problems for different audiences. Curran teaches authority-building for founders who sell services (slow, deep, trust-based). Feijen teaches content business-building for creators who sell products or scale through volume (fast, proof-driven, algorithmic). The mistake is copying Feijen's volume cadence if you're selling $50K consulting, or copying Curran's storytelling if you're building a TikTok Shop affiliate business. Match your hook style, cadence, and proof type to your actual business model. Feijen's 77.5% conversation rate isn't better than Curran's 35.5% conversation rate—it's different. Feijen's readers comment because they want to learn the tool stack. Curran's readers comment because they want to hire him. Know which one you're building for.
More comparisons featuring Kris J. Curran or Stijn Feijen
VSMark A. Pfister vs Stijn Feijen: Celebration beats shock on LinkedIn
VSOskar Moen vs Stijn Feijen: Volume beats depth on LinkedIn
VS
Stijn Feijen vs Timi Merivirta: Volume Play vs Conversion Machine
VSOrlando Belfor vs Stijn Feijen: Community vs Conversion on LinkedIn
VSBray Jaks vs Stijn Feijen: Vulnerability beats volume on LinkedIn
VSKris J. Curran vs Mark A. Pfister: Teaching Through Stories vs Teaching Through Celebration