Skip to main content
Head-to-head breakdown

Codie Sanchez vs Noah Kagan: Scale versus Conversation on LinkedIn

Codie Sanchez dominates reach with 569K followers and 1893 avg engagement per post, while Noah Kagan builds deeper conversation at 17.2% conversation index despite 107K followers. Choose Codie if you want viral contrarian takes; choose Noah if you want to build a tight community of engaged followers who actually respond.

TL;DR
  • Codie: 5.3x more followers, 5.7x higher engagement. Noah: 1.3% higher conversation rate.
  • Codie uses dismissive confidence ('Most won't get it'). Noah uses vulnerable credibility ('I got fired').
  • Both post 15+ times weekly with numbered lists. Codie wins on reach, Noah on depth.
  • Codie's top hook hit 9082 engagements. Noah's best reached 3350. Different games entirely.

Side by side

DimensionCodie SanchezNoah Kagan
VoiceDirect, contrarian, rebellious confidence that dismisses naysayers with 'Most won't get it… who cares.'Vulnerable, mentor-like, builds trust by admitting failures like getting fired from Facebook.
Content mixAcquisition entrepreneurship, financial freedom, contrarian thinking, personal development, business insights.Career advice, entrepreneurship, personal development, Facebook lessons, contrarian takes.
Hook styleBold declarative statements challenging beliefs ('This is the real rich life') and dismissive confidence.Personal anecdotes ('I was employee #30 at Facebook') leading into numbered actionable lists.
Engagement pattern1893 avg engagement per post with 15.2% conversation index, optimized for reach and debate.333 avg engagement per post with 17.2% conversation index, optimized for quality discussion.
Posting cadence15.2 posts per week, best on Sunday, 3.2% repost rate.15.3 posts per week, best on Sunday, 2.6% repost rate.

Who wins what

Reach→ Codie Sanchez

569K followers vs 107K, and 1893 avg engagement vs 333 means her posts reach 5.7x more people per post.

Conversation→ Noah Kagan

17.2% conversation index vs Codie's 15.2% means Noah's followers are 1.3% more likely to reply and discuss.

Saveability→ Noah Kagan

Numbered lists with actionable advice are inherently more saveable than contrarian declarations.

ConsistencyTie

Both post 15+ times weekly with identical top format (numbered lists) and same best day (Sunday).

Codie SanchezPick Codie Sanchez if…
  • You want to build a large, engaged audience fast. Codie's 569K followers and 1893 avg engagement prove contrarian takes scale.
  • You're selling a mindset shift or premium course. Her 'unpopular truth' hooks spark debate that builds authority.
  • You thrive on being provocative. Phrases like 'Most won't get it… who cares' attract people who want permission to think differently.
Steal from Codie Sanchez
  • Use short, declarative hooks that challenge one belief in under 10 words. 'This is the real rich life' hit 9082 engagements because it's bold and complete.
  • Adopt dismissive confidence language ('Most won't get it… who cares') to attract contrarian thinkers and repel people who drain energy.
  • Post on Sunday. Codie's best day is Sunday, suggesting weekend scrollers are primed for entrepreneurship and mindset content.
Noah KaganPick Noah Kagan if…
  • You want deeper, more meaningful engagement. Noah's 17.2% conversation index means followers actually reply and build relationships.
  • You have real operational experience to share. His Facebook and AppSumo credibility makes numbered lists feel earned, not preachy.
  • You're building a community, not just an audience. His vulnerable storytelling ('I got fired') creates trust that converts to loyalty.
Steal from Noah Kagan
  • Lead with a personal failure or credential before giving advice. 'I was employee #30 at Facebook. Then I got fired' earned 2482 engagements because it's vulnerable.
  • Structure every post as a numbered list with actionable steps. This format is inherently saveable and teachable, boosting perceived value.
  • Transition from story to lesson explicitly. Noah's pattern of 'But the lessons I learned...' bridges personal narrative to universal advice.
The real lesson

Codie and Noah play different LinkedIn games on the same board. Codie optimizes for reach and provocation, using contrarian declarations that spark debate at scale. Noah optimizes for depth and trust, using vulnerability and numbered frameworks that build community. Neither approach is wrong. Codie's 5.7x engagement advantage proves contrarian takes win the algorithm. Noah's 1.3% conversation edge proves they win hearts. If you want to grow fast, steal Codie's voice. If you want to stay relevant long-term, steal Noah's structure. The real win is combining both: contrarian hooks with numbered, actionable advice.