Dima Bilous wins on raw engagement (582 avg, 75.9% conversation rate) by teaching B2B founders to build AI sales agents with role-negation hooks and contrarian claims. Kris J. Curran wins on authenticity and founder narrative by teaching solopreneurs to ghostwrite content that sounds like them, but posts 3x less frequently and generates minimal engagement. Choose Dima if you're building a sales system. Choose Kris if you're building personal authority through consistency.

Founder @ Anfloy • Built 100+ AI Agents for GTM, content and internal ops • Sharing the workflows that scale revenue

Fractional Executive Operator & LinkedIn Ghostwriter | Turning Founder Vision Into Systems, Content, and Scale
| Dimension | Dima Bilous | Kris J. Curran |
|---|---|---|
| Voice | Direct, pattern-breaking, technically credible. Writes like someone who shipped and is reporting back ('No templates. No guessing.'). | Direct, slightly contrarian, peer-to-peer. Writes like someone tired of generic templates ('That's not ghostwriting. That's content production.'). |
| Content mix | 80% AI agent workflows and role evolution. 15% signal-based outreach tactics. 5% tool integrations and case studies. | 60% ghostwriting and voice authenticity. 25% content strategy and consistency math. 15% story mining and audience building. |
| Hook style | Role negation ('It's not X. It's not Y. It's Z.') and behavior flip ('I stopped cold outreach. Now I only use...'). | Specific client credential ('Founders running $2M-$20M businesses...') and hot take contradiction ('Most LinkedIn ghostwriters don't sound like their clients.'). |
| Engagement pattern | 75.9% conversation index. Top post hit 2708 engagements. Readers comment to ask follow-up questions about implementation. | 35.5% conversation index. Top post hit 11 engagements. Minimal comment volume suggests audience size or algorithm mismatch. |
| Posting cadence | 3.3 posts/week. Consistent output drives algorithmic favor and keeps audience in active learning mode. | 1.2 posts/week. Lower frequency limits impression compounding but may reflect quality-over-quantity philosophy. |
13757 followers vs 9770. But Dima's 582 avg engagement per post vastly outpaces Kris's 4 avg engagement.
75.9% conversation index vs 35.5%. Dima's role-negation hooks trigger 2x more comment replies per post.
AI agent workflows and case studies (SaaStr: 1.2 humans + 20 agents replaced 10 SDRs) are actionable and shareable. Kris's ghostwriting advice is more abstract.
3.3 posts/week vs 1.2 posts/week. Dima's cadence compounds impressions and keeps audience engaged in a fast-moving niche.
Pick Dima Bilous if…
Pick Kris J. Curran if…Dima and Kris solve different problems for different audiences. Dima wins because he teaches a system (AI agents) that's novel, technical, and generates immediate proof points. His role-negation hooks and 3.3x/week cadence compound into 75.9% conversation engagement. Kris wins because he teaches authenticity and consistency, which solopreneurs need but rarely execute. The lesson: engagement isn't about follower count. It's about niche clarity, hook pattern mastery, and cadence that matches your audience's learning velocity. Dima's audience wants to build and ship. Kris's audience wants to sound like themselves. Pick your niche first. The hook patterns follow.
VS
Dima Bilous vs Mark A. Pfister: Viral hooks versus graduate spotlights
VS
Dima Bilous vs Timi Merivirta: AI workflows or lead-gen systems
VS
Dima Bilous vs Oskar Moen: Automation teacher or metrics hustler?
VS
Kris J. Curran vs Stijn Feijen: Authority vs Automation on LinkedIn
VS
Kris J. Curran vs Mark A. Pfister: Teaching Through Stories vs Teaching Through Celebration
VS
Bray Jaks vs Kris J. Curran: Vulnerability beats authority on LinkedIn