Skip to main content
Dataset · Cadencen = 163· Posts collected 2025-2026

Does posting more on LinkedIn drive more engagement? Cadence × performance data

Posts-per-week × avg engagement across 43 creators. The curve is not linear.

Headline finding

LinkedIn creators posting 7+ times per week average 644 engagements per post, nearly double the 332 average for creators posting 1-3 times per week, but the 5-7 posts/week range actually drops back to 337, suggesting a volume trap in the middle.

Across 163 LinkedIn creators, average engagement does not rise linearly with posting frequency. The 5-7 posts/week cadence group averages only 337 engagements per post, virtually identical to the 1-3 posts/week group at 332, while the 7+ group jumps to 644. The most striking outliers, including Simon Sinek at 7,543 average engagements posting 5.8 times/week and Steven Bartlett at 8,926 posting 15.2 times/week, suggest that audience size and content quality interact with cadence in ways raw frequency alone cannot explain.

The data

Posting cadenceCreatorsAvg engagement
< 1/week5155
1-3/week19332
3-5/week27432
5-7/week32337
7+/week80644

Key findings

  • 1

    Creators posting 7+ times/week average 644 engagements per post, the highest of any cadence group across 163 creators.

  • 2

    The 5-7 posts/week group averages only 337 engagements, nearly identical to the 1-3 posts/week group at 332, indicating a mid-frequency plateau.

  • 3

    Creators posting fewer than once per week average just 155 engagements per post, the lowest of all five cadence groups.

  • 4

    Andrew Ng posts 3 times/week and averages 4,246 engagements, the highest average in the 3-5 posts/week cadence band.

  • 5

    Steven Bartlett averages 8,926 engagements per post at 15.2 posts/week, the highest individual average in the entire dataset.

  • 6

    Dillon Dao averages 987 engagements at only 1.5 posts/week, outperforming 80 creators in the 7+ posts/week group.

  • 7

    80 of the 163 creators in this dataset post 7 or more times per week, making it the most common cadence group by creator count.

What it means

The data challenges the assumption that posting more consistently produces more engagement. The 5-7 posts/week range, which many content calendars target as a daily cadence, averages only 337 engagements per post. That is almost identical to posting just 1-3 times per week. Creators who push past 7 posts/week see a meaningful jump to 644 average engagements, but this group also contains some of the largest accounts in the dataset, including Gary Vaynerchuk at 5.9 million followers and Steven Bartlett at 3.1 million, which pulls the group average upward.

The scatter data reveals that follower count and content resonance matter more than cadence alone. Dillon Dao averages 987 engagements at 1.5 posts/week with only 11,446 followers. Rutger Bregman averages 1,247 engagements at 2.1 posts/week. Meanwhile, creators posting daily at 5-6 times/week with tens of thousands of followers frequently average under 50 engagements per post. Frequency without audience fit does not produce results.

For most creators, the practical implication is this: moving from under 1 post/week to 1-3 posts/week more than doubles average engagement from 155 to 332. That is the highest return-on-frequency jump in the dataset. Beyond 3 posts/week, the engagement gains flatten until a creator reaches very high volume, likely supported by a content production system or team.

Who this is for

  • You are a B2B founder or marketer deciding how many times per week to post on LinkedIn and want data to justify your content calendar.
  • You are a content strategist advising clients on LinkedIn posting schedules and need benchmark engagement figures by cadence.
  • You are a researcher or journalist writing about creator economics or social media algorithm behavior on LinkedIn.
  • You manage a personal brand or creator account and are trying to determine whether increasing posting frequency is worth the production cost.
  • You are building or evaluating a LinkedIn analytics or creator tool and want third-party benchmark data to contextualize your own platform metrics.

Methodology

This dataset covers 163 LinkedIn creators tracked by Creator (getcreator.io), measuring average post engagements and self-reported or observed posting frequency per week. Creators were grouped into five cadence bands: fewer than 1 post/week, 1-3, 3-5, 5-7, and 7+ posts/week. Average engagement per post is the primary performance metric and reflects reactions, comments, and shares as aggregated by the Creator platform. The dataset is not a random sample of LinkedIn users; it skews toward active, public-facing creators and includes several accounts with very large followings, which may inflate group averages, particularly in the 7+ cadence band.

Limitations

This dataset covers 163 creators and is not a statistically representative sample of LinkedIn's broader creator population. Engagement averages are sensitive to outliers: a single viral post from a large account can significantly raise a creator's average. The data does not control for follower count, content format, industry vertical, or audience geography, all of which independently affect engagement. Causality cannot be established from this data. It is not possible to determine whether high-frequency posting causes higher engagement or whether creators with already-engaged audiences feel confident posting more often. Follower counts are missing for several creators in the scatter data, limiting per-follower engagement analysis.

Cite this dataset

Creator. (2026). “Does posting more on LinkedIn drive more engagement? Cadence × performance data”. Retrieved from https://www.getcreator.io/data/linkedin-posting-cadence-vs-engagement

More datasets

All datasets