Skip to main content

How Simone Levie hits 511 avg engagement with emotional tool breakups

The exact hook patterns, voice moves, and tactical shifts that make her AI automation posts stop the scroll.

4 min read
intermediate
Simone Levie has 40,346 followers and a 64% conversation rate. That's not accident. Her posts about switching from ChatGPT to Claude, or ditching ad spend for LinkedIn-only growth, don't read like business advice. They read like a friend thinking out loud in your DMs. The data backs it up: her emotional pivot hooks average 511 engagements. Her story openings pull 234. And her cliffhanger CTAs drive comment volume high enough that most of her engagement happens in the replies, not the feed. She's built authority in AI automation and business scaling for online coaches by treating tools like romantic partners and strategic decisions like plot twists.
The short answer

64% of her engagement is comments—twice the industry average for business creators.

How Simone writes

Simone writes in casual Dutch-inflected English that feels intimate and slightly irreverent. She admits uncertainty. She uses signature phrases like 'Het is uit met Chattie. Ik stop ermee. Met pijn in mijn hart ook want ik heb er uren en uren mee bezig geweest'—a breakup announcement that treats an AI tool like a person you've grown attached to. This isn't a gimmick. It's how she thinks. She personifies tools, platforms, and strategies as characters with agency and personality. When she pivots, she doesn't say 'I optimized my workflow.' She says 'Ik heb een nieuwe affaire' (I have a new affair). This tone makes abstract technical decisions feel human and relatable. Vulnerability is her credibility. She frames failures as learning pivots, never as weakness. The result is a voice that feels like a peer, not a coach.

Signature phrases Simone uses repeatedly

What they post about

Simone's content sits in four tight pillars. Each one teaches through her own decisions and reversals.
Content pillars
Pillar
What They Teach
% Of Posts
AI Tool Pivots & Reviews
Personal stories about switching between AI platforms (ChatGPT to Claude, new tool launches) paired with specific use cases and why the switch matters for business efficiency
35%
Business Model Shifts
Narrative-driven posts about scaling decisions (cutting ad spend, moving to LinkedIn-only, profit vs. revenue) that teach through the creator's own pivot
25%
Automation & Workflow Hacks
Tactical breakdowns of how to use AI to automate specific tasks (email responses, funnel building, document creation) without losing control or quality
20%
Tool Launches & Beta Calls
Announcement posts for new products or masterclasses with a problem-first framing and direct CTA for testers or participants
15%
Founder Stories & Collaborations
Posts about other builders (Michel Mousa) or personal breakthroughs that position Simone as part of a peer network, not just a solo expert
5%

The hook patterns they reuse

Her hooks follow four repeatable patterns. The first is the dramatic breakup or pivot—announce a major tool or strategy change with emotional language, then reveal the business reason. The second treats a tool or platform as a romantic partner or character with personality. The third sets up a success story, then immediately introduces a contradiction that demands explanation. The fourth opens with a specific action she took and immediately shows the result. Her top hook, 'Het is uit met Chattie. Ik stop ermee,' pulled 6,300 engagements because it violates the expected tone of a business post. It reads like relationship drama, not a product review.

Dramatic Breakup / Pivot

Formula: Announce a major tool or strategy change with emotional language, then explain the business or ethical reason behind it Example: "Het is uit met Chattie. Ik stop ermee. Met pijn in mijn hart ook want ik heb er uren en uren mee bezig geweest." Why: Readers expect a personal story but get a business lesson, creating cognitive dissonance that forces them to read on and comment to understand the stakes.

Metaphor as Relationship

Formula: Treat a tool, platform, or strategy as a romantic partner or character with personality and agency Example: "Ik heb een nieuwe affaire. Met Claude. Geen idee hoelang hij blijft." Why: Humanizing abstract tech makes it memorable and shareable; readers tag friends and comment because the framing is unexpected and fun.

Curiosity Gap with Contrast

Formula: Set up a success story, then immediately introduce a contradiction or reversal that demands explanation Example: "Hij bouwde in 3 jaar een miljoenenbusiness door LinkedIn. En morgen trekt hij de stekker eruit." Why: The gap between expectation (success = continuation) and reality (success = exit) triggers high comment volume as readers ask why.

Direct Action Narrative

Formula: Open with a specific action you took (sent a message, made a decision) and immediately show the result Example: "Ik stuurde een WhatsApp. 'Beantwoord mijn openstaande mails.' Tien minuten later was het gedaan." Why: Concrete, vivid, and immediately demonstrates capability; readers want to know how and ask in comments.

Simone's top-performing hooks

Here are her five highest-performing hooks. Notice the pattern: emotion first, business reason second.
Top 5 hooks ranked by engagement
Hook
Engagement
Style
"Het is uit met Chattie. Ik stop ermee. Met pijn in mijn hart ook want ik heb er uren en uren mee bezig geweest. Chattie is mijn maatje."
6300
Bold Statement
"Ik heb een nieuwe affaire."
1771
Curiosity Gap / Metaphor Opening
"Ik heb een briljante tool ontwikkeld voor LinkedIn. En nu zoek ik testers."
1311
Bold Statement
"Ik stuurde een WhatsApp. "Beantwoord mijn openstaande mails.""
930
Story Opening
"Hij bouwde in 3 jaar een miljoenenbusiness door LinkedIn. En morgen trekt hij de stekker eruit."
869
Curiosity Gap / Dramatic Contrast

What actually works in their posts

Bold statement hooks with emotional language drive 511 average engagement across 20 posts. Story openings that start with a personal action ('Ik stuurde een WhatsApp,' 'Halverwege zag ik het') pull 234 average engagements. And cliffhanger endings that cut off mid-sentence force readers to click or comment—her top three hooks all use this pattern and rank in the top 5 by engagement, pushing her conversation index to 64%.

What Simone does well

Steal these tactics for your own LinkedIn

Four moves you can apply to your own posts starting this week.

Apply these tomorrow morning

The meta-lesson from Simone Levie is this: emotional honesty beats polish. She doesn't hide her pivots or frame them as inevitable wins. She shows the decision-making process, the doubt, the reasoning. She treats tools and strategies as characters with personality, not features with benefits. And she cuts off her CTAs mid-sentence to force engagement. The result is a 64% conversation rate and a feed that feels like a peer sharing what actually works, not a marketer selling what sounds good. Study her full analysis to see the exact hook formulas, content pillars, and tactical moves that drive her engagement.