B2B LinkedIn CTR Benchmarks by Funnel Stage and Buyer Role
B2B LinkedIn CTR is 0.8% to 1.5% overall on an organic post with the link in the first comment, and the number splits cleanly by where the reader sits in a buying process. Top-of-funnel posts sending people to a free read run 1.0% to 1.8%. Bottom-of-funnel posts asking for a demo run 0.3% to 0.7%. Buyer role moves the number almost as much: talent and marketing audiences click roughly twice as often as procurement and finance ones.
Last updated: September 2026 · Next update: December 2026 · Methodology
The B2B bands
Top of funnel
1.0–1.8%
Free read, no commitment behind the click
Middle of funnel
0.6–1.2%
Named asset in exchange for contact details
Bottom of funnel
0.3–0.7%
Demo, pricing or a call
B2B LinkedIn CTR by funnel stage (compiled ranges)
| Funnel stage | Organic CTR |
|---|---|
| Top of funnel, free read | 1.0–1.8% |
| Top of funnel, subscribe | 1.5–3% |
| Middle of funnel, named asset | 0.6–1.2% |
| Middle of funnel, event | 0.6–1.2% |
| Bottom of funnel, demo or pricing | 0.3–0.7% |
| Retention and expansion | 1.0–2.0% |
Compiled planning ranges for organic posts with the link in the first comment. Read down the table and the pattern is the commitment behind the click, not the quality of the writing above it.
B2B LinkedIn CTR by buyer role (compiled ranges)
| Audience | Organic CTR |
|---|---|
| Talent and HR leaders | 1.0–1.8% |
| Marketing leaders | 1.0–1.8% |
| Founders and CEOs at small companies | 0.9–1.6% |
| Sales leaders | 0.9–1.5% |
| Operations and supply chain | 0.7–1.2% |
| Engineering and IT | 0.6–1.1% |
| Finance leaders | 0.5–1.0% |
| Procurement | 0.4–0.8% |
Compiled ranges. The spread across roles is roughly two times, similar in size to the spread across funnel stages, which is why an account selling one product to two different roles should hold two different targets.
What Creator computes across B2B accounts
| Cut | Bottom 25% | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Engagement per post, English-language | 14 | 44 |
| English-language, with media | 26.5 | 75.5 |
| English-language, without media | 11 | 35 |
| Engagement per post, all accounts | 12 | 34 |
Engagement, not clicks. Creator's dataset is largely B2B personal accounts and carries no funnel-stage or buyer-role label, so neither cut on this page can be computed. The media rows are the useful part: an English-language post carrying media reaches a median of 75.5 reactions and comments against 35 without, which is the largest computed difference Creator can show on this dataset.
Running B2B content against these bands
Hold one target per audience, not one per company
Selling the same product to marketing and to procurement means two bands roughly two times apart. A blended target makes the procurement content look broken and the marketing content look finished.
Most posts should be top of funnel
The bottom-of-funnel band exists because only a small share of any audience is in a buying cycle this quarter. A feed weighted toward demo asks converts the few and loses the many, and the reach loss shows up in the next quarter.
Add media to the posts that carry a link
Creator's computed figures put English-language posts with media at a median of 75.5 reactions and comments against 35 without. That is the denominator underneath every click rate on this page, and it is the one lever the data actually proves.
Judge bottom-of-funnel work on the quarter
At 0.3% to 0.7% a single demo post produces a handful of clicks. The signal is which angle keeps appearing in the deals that closed, which needs three months of posts rather than three.
Frequently asked questions
What is a good B2B CTR on LinkedIn?
0.8% to 1.5% overall on an organic post with the link in the first comment. Split by intent it is 1.0% to 1.8% for a free read at the top of the funnel and 0.3% to 0.7% for a demo or pricing page at the bottom. Comparing a bottom-of-funnel post against the overall band is the most common misread.
Does B2B CTR change by buyer role?
Yes, by roughly two times. Compiled ranges put talent, HR and marketing audiences at 1.0% to 1.8% and procurement at 0.4% to 0.8%. Roles that use LinkedIn as a daily work tool click more than roles that arrive late in a buying process and research elsewhere.
Why is bottom-of-funnel LinkedIn CTR so low?
Because only a small share of any audience is in a buying cycle at the moment the post appears. At 0.3% to 0.7% the post is measuring that share rather than measuring the writing, which is why bottom-of-funnel content is judged on pipeline over a quarter instead of on clicks per post.
Do B2B posts perform better with images?
On engagement, clearly. Creator's computed figures put English-language posts carrying media at a median of 75.5 reactions and comments per post across 27,378 posts and 280 accounts, against 35 for posts without media across 23,506 posts and 273 accounts. Those are engagement figures, and engagement sets the audience size that any click rate is applied to.
How many B2B posts should be selling?
Few. The compiled bands make the case on their own: a top-of-funnel post reaches 1.0% to 1.8% and a demo post 0.3% to 0.7%, and the demo post also costs reach because it reads as a pitch. Most accounts land on a small share of directly commercial posts and treat the rest as the reason anyone reads those.
Is LinkedIn CTR different for B2B and B2C?
The bands on this page are B2B and assume a work-hours audience reading in a professional context. Consumer content on the same platform behaves differently because the purchase is personal and the decision is faster. Creator publishes B2B figures only, and does not hold a consumer dataset to compare against.
Can Creator compute B2B CTR by funnel stage?
No. Creator's post dataset carries no click counts, no funnel-stage label and no buyer-role label. Every rate on this page is a compiled planning range. The computed table reports engagement across 53,771 English-language posts and 367 accounts and is labelled as engagement.
Methodology
Funnel-stage and buyer-role bands are compiled planning ranges. Creator's LinkedInPost table carries no click counts, no funnel labels and no audience-role labels, so none of these cuts can be computed and none is presented as measured.
Bands assume an organic post from a personal profile with the link in the first comment, which is the placement most B2B accounts use. A link in the post body runs 0.2% to 0.4% at every funnel stage.
The computed table is real. English-language, with-media and without-media cuts come from benchmark_within_sender('reactions_plus_comments') run against Creator's production database on 2026-09-09, at a floor of 20 accounts and 30 posts per account.
The English-language cut is used as the closest available proxy for a B2B account in this dataset, and it is stated as a language cut rather than relabelled as a market cut. Creator's dataset holds no industry, company-size or role classification to cut on instead.
Funnel-stage and buyer-role CTR ranges are compiled figures consistent with Creator's published click-through rate benchmarks and with public social benchmark reporting. The computed engagement table comes from Creator's LinkedInPost dataset via benchmark_within_sender(), 2026-09-09.
Understand the terms
Click-Through Rate
Clicks divided by impressions, times 100.
Top of Funnel
Content for people who are not buying anything yet.
Bottom of Funnel
Content for the small share already in a buying cycle.
Lead Magnet
Free resource exchanged for an email or DM reply.
Buying Committee
The several roles that must agree on a B2B purchase.
Compiled Range
A planning figure drawn from industry reporting, not measured here.
LinkedIn Content Playbook
A feed weighted for the audience that is not buying yet.
More LinkedIn benchmarks
See how your content compares
Creator tracks your performance against these benchmarks automatically and tells you exactly what to fix.
Apply to work with us